Should Wild Force Be considered a Saban Season?
 

I know Disney already owned the show....But it felt like a Saban Season. The same production team was also there. They also still shot in Valencia. Plus they had "Forever Red" to basically rnd the Saban Era.

Re: Should Wild Force Be considered a Saban Season?
 

Wild Force should be considered the last of the first Saban era season. Saban started Wild Force to be the last of the Power Rangers series. Ninja Storm was the first official Disney Power Rangers series. ;)

Re: Should Wild Force Be considered a Saban Season?
 

Wild Force is a Disney season .They already bought Power Rangers during Times Force's post production. And even had some influence on that. They definitely had influence over Wild Force. Its just the same production team was there and they still shot in the same place. Just because more changes were made with Ninja Storm doesn't mean a Disney owned Season can be part of the old Saban Era. Its not like every season in the old Saban Era was always the same tone.

Re: Should Wild Force Be considered a Saban Season?
 

I'd rather consider it a Bhaumik Era Season. Since Amit wasn't in charge of the earlier Saban Seasons and of course not the Disney Era. I really wish Saban Brands put him in charge of the Neo Saban Era. They made him a consultant in Samurai but he had no real power and they didn't even keep him around.

Re: Should Wild Force Be considered a Saban Season?
 

Its not Saban era . But it alsonis really only Disney era in name only. Even though Disney owned the show and had influence.....There was still enough of the old guard there to make it different..If anythinf you could call it an MMPR Productions season.

Re: Should Wild Force Be considered a Saban Season?
 

Now I know Saban had started pre-production on Wild Force and likely even did some casting before Disney completely took over but regardless of that and the fact that Saban's production team was still working on the show I don't believe it should be considered a Saban season.

Yes Disney allowed the team to do whatever it wanted (well within reason of course) but they also had to follow Disney's censorship rules.

Re: Should Wild Force Be considered a Saban Season?
 

I doesn't really matter to me since its was so good. But I guess it was a hybrid season.

Re: Should Wild Force Be considered a Saban Season?
 

I can understand why people are hesitant to call it a Disney Era season. Even though I am inclined to call it a Saban Season..I know it can't be officially considered that. You can't deny that it is different than the other Disney seasons. It is a bit different than some of the Saban Seasons too.Its Power Rangers wierd stepchild.

Re: Should Wild Force Be considered a Saban Season?
 

Its hard not to consider it a Saban Season. Not just because of MMPR Productions (even though Lynn and Marchand were gone and Bhaumik in). But mainly because of "Forever Red" and all the connections to the Saban Era there. It was almost would be series finalie if Wild Force was the end. It was also the last in the longest slcycle for team ups. Which were scarce in the Disney and even Neo Saban Era.

Re: Should Wild Force Be considered a Saban Season?
 

I consider it a Saban Season. Just based on tone and the production team being largely that same. It was certainly better than that crappy Ninja Storm.